The stars have aligned, but rather than creating the correct conditions for Cthulhu to rise from his slumber, the end result is that I’m actually following through on writing yet another Lovecraft post. Your excitement over this development may vary; it’s possible that you were looking forward to being driven mad by the sight of a being the size of a mountain striding out of the sea. If so, apologies, and I hope my little blog post can provide you at least a taste of cosmic horror until the day when the one who is dead but dreaming awakens.
That plan has been altered slightly, as in this post I’ll
only be addressing the works which comprise the first of Joshi’s new volumes, “Collected
Fiction Volume 1 (1905-1925).” After that I’ll follow up with three additional
posts which follow the same format for each of the remaining volumes, at which
point the posts actually digging into the stories should (hopefully) begin.
Another development from the comments was my desire to write about how weird
fiction in general, and Lovecraft in particular, has gone through a resurgence
in the past decade or so, and the last few years have been particularly interesting.
It is not lost on me that this resurgence coincides with my own burgeoning
interest in the subject; the Dark Tower fan in me wants to call it ka, but
which kind of ka I don’t rightly know yet.
As I mentioned in the first post, I kind of jumped all
over the place when I first started reading Lovecraft. That works fine for
getting into an author's body of work, but is less conducive to the sort of
semi-academic pursuits I have in mind. In an effort to catalogue all of his
fiction – and to quiet my every-present collectioning OCD – I did at least have
the presence of mind to compile a list of all of his stories a few years ago.
Like most amateur scholars, I visited the hallowed halls of Wikipedia, and to
the site’s credit obtained a nearly complete chronological list of not just
Lovecraft’s own writing, but also the stories he had edited / ghost written,
and the ones August Derleth had supposedly “finished” from notes Lovecraft left
behind.
The Beast in the Cave
The Alchemist
The Tomb
Dagon
A Reminiscence of Dr. Samuel Johnson
Polaris
Beyond the Wall of Sleep
Memory
Old Bugs
The Transition of Juan Romero
The White Ship
The Street
The Doom that Came to Sarnath
The Statement of Randolph Carter
The Terrible Old Man
The Tree
The Cats of Ulthar
The Temple
Facts Concerning the Late Arthur Jermyn and His Family
Celephaïs
From Beyond
Nyarlathotep
The Picture in the House
Ex Oblivione
Sweet Ermengarde
The Nameless City
The Quest of Iranon
The Moon-Bog
The Other Gods
The Outsider
The Music of Erich Zann
Herbert West–Reanimator
Hypnos
What the Moon Brings
Azathoth
The Hound
The Lurking Fear
The Rats in the Walls
The Unnamable
The Festival
Under the Pyramids (Imprisoned with the Pharaohs)*
The Shunned House
The Horror at Red Hook
He
In the Vault
---
That’s 44 stories total, which is not an insignificant
number, even for a volume that runs 530 pages, although many of them are quite
short. Now, for the kicker: As of this writing, I have only read seven (!) of
the tales listed above, and a couple of those are the shorter ones. So without
counting those – even though I intended to re-read all of them for this
undertaking – that leaves me with 37 stories to read twice, take notes on, and
evaluate in the course of finishing “Collected Fiction Volume 1 (1905-1925).”
(If you think you hear something coming through the computer that sounds like a
man screaming and running away, just ignore it. I’m sure everything is fine.)
For now, I’m going to list the stories I’ve read, plus give a very brief outline
of what I can remember about them.*When I originally posted this, I somehow missed that "Under the Pyramids" was included in this volume. I have added a synopsis for it below.
“The Doom that Came to Sarnath”
I read this story after “The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath,”
in which the protagonist Randolph Carter comes across the ruined city of
Sarnath on his journey. Of course, Lovecraft clearly wrote this tale before his
longer imaginative epic and saw fit to incorporate it into the later story.
He’s hardly the first author to do this, but I think he might arguably be the
best at it. Unfortunately, I don’t remember many specifics from this story,
other than that it don’t end well for the titular locale, do ye kennit?
“The Statement of Randolph Carter”
“The Cats of Ulthar”
Now we’re three-for-three on stories that would eventually
come to be incorporated into Dream-Quest, and it occurs to me that I should
eventually do a post – or a series of posts, or a dissertation – about how,
like the Dark Tower for Stephen King, the tale Randolph Carter’s travels in the
dreaming realm has tendrils which thread themselves through most of Lovecraft’s
work. This particular yarn (cat pun intended!) is about a city where no man may
kill a cat, and precisely how that law came to be.
“The Nameless City”
Aha! Here we have a story which doesn’t seem to have any
direct connections to Dream-Quest… but is also basically the acknowledged
starting point for the Cthulhu mythos! It’s most well-known for being the first
appearance of the demonic couplet:
“That is not dead which can eternal lie; And with strange
aeons even death may die.”
This couplet is attributed to the “mad Arab” Abdul Alhazred,
writer of the fabled grimoire known as the Necronomicon, and both appear
frequently in following Lovecraft works. The core of this story involves an
unnamed traveler making his way deep into the desert, where he finds an
entrance to an ancient – and possibly inhuman – city. From a writing
perspective, this is where we first see many of the concepts and stylistic
choices which permeate Lovecraft’s most famous stories.
“Herbert West–Reanimator”
Whether or not this story links to other is debatable, but it is the foundation for what is unquestionably the most well-known direct film adaptation of a Lovecraft story. I’d wager that anyone with at least a passing interest in horror is aware of Re-Animator (that’s how the movie stylizes the title). If that interest is any deeper than passing - and especially if it leans toward cult classics, cool gore effects, or schlocky B movies – then chances are good they’ve seen it.
Whether or not this story links to other is debatable, but it is the foundation for what is unquestionably the most well-known direct film adaptation of a Lovecraft story. I’d wager that anyone with at least a passing interest in horror is aware of Re-Animator (that’s how the movie stylizes the title). If that interest is any deeper than passing - and especially if it leans toward cult classics, cool gore effects, or schlocky B movies – then chances are good they’ve seen it.
The story focuses on the experiments of the titular
Herbert West, as told by his one-time friend and assistant. There’s quite a bit
of Frankenstein in there, along with some Island of Doctor Moreau. I quite
enjoyed the story, though it causes divisiveness among some readers. (Hey
there, Bryant and McMolo!) I will say that while it does put to use some of the
tropes Lovecraft often relied upon, it reads differently than most of his other
works in a way I can’t quite put my finger on.
“The Lurking Fear”
Y’all, this story terrifies me for multiple reasons, none
of which I’ll spoil here. Though I admittedly haven’t read every story that
preceded this one, to my knowledge this is the first tale to fully employ the
tropes which would become Lovecraft’s bread and butter. The narrator becomes
embroiled in attempting to unravel a mystery that’s best left unsolved, and begins
digging up parts of the past best left undisturbed; it also involves strange
mounds of dirt and lightning strikes.
Along with the previous story, this one marks one of the earliest examples of Lovecraft’s “unnamed protagonist messes with things they ought not to” structure put to its full effect. I have a friend (Hi, Erich!) who puts this at the top of his list as far as scare factor; I personally still find “The Lurking Fear” to be more horrifying, but this one certainly delivers on the fear scale. Spoiler Alert: The titular rats are far from the most unsettling part of the tale.
“Under the Pyramids (Imprisoned with the Pharaohs)”
Lovecraft listened to the story and, unsurprisingly,
determined it was utter nonsense, but found a nugget of potential within. After
getting clearance from Henneberger to add his own twist to the tale, Lovecraft wrote
“Under the Pyramids.” He then lost that manuscript, and had to completely
rewrite it during his honeymoon, which is when it became “Imprisoned with the
Pharaohs.” The story was split into three parts and published in Weird Tales
under the new title, although Lovecraft was given no credit, since Henneberger
wanted readers to think it was Houdini telling the story.
I was therefore expecting to find the story in the contents of the fourth of Joshi’s new volumes – which deals with revisions and collaborations – rather than in this first volume. It wasn’t until I was reviewing the fourth volume’s table of contents last night that I realized my error. I would have been exceedingly surprised if this story hadn’t been included at all if for no other reason than Joshi himself has praised it on numerous occasions.
I was therefore expecting to find the story in the contents of the fourth of Joshi’s new volumes – which deals with revisions and collaborations – rather than in this first volume. It wasn’t until I was reviewing the fourth volume’s table of contents last night that I realized my error. I would have been exceedingly surprised if this story hadn’t been included at all if for no other reason than Joshi himself has praised it on numerous occasions.
I was personally flustered to find I had mistakenly overlooked
it because I also greatly enjoy this particular yarn. I’ve had a bit of the
Egyptian mysteries flu my entire life, and Lovecraft uses the setting to great
effect. Equally effective is the claustrophobia that begins to sink in the
longer “Houdini” spends in those ancient, torch-lit tunnels. The finale is
terrific, and I remember upon reading it that I felt the creators of Stargate
owed Lovecraft a fair more amount of credit than they’ve given him, which as
far as I know is none whatsoever.
Between now and then, depending on time, I may go ahead
and do a post like this one for the remaining three volumes in the new Joshi
set. My reading time is currently more limited than my writing time, and since
these posts really just consist of me listing stories off a table of contents
page and reminiscing about them, I can get them done more expediently than the
analytical pieces.
7 comments:
Well, I've only read 2 of these ("Herman West, Re-animator" and "Rats in the Walls.") The two Lovecraft movies I remember most are "Re-Animator," although I only ever saw it once - much more familiar with the poster from seeing it in friends' houses and at the video store back in the day - and "From Beyond." Which a buddy of mine loved so I ended up seeing that a dozen times or so in the 80s. Not since, though. (Not counting a couple of minutes here and there on cable in the interim.)
So! Not much to bring to the table tonight, I'm afraid. Uhhh... Australia's all-out for 327 with England set to bat next for their first innings of the Fourth Test of The Ashes.
Oh and I sat down to read "Providence" and - naturally - ended up reading the first 2 volumes of LXG and half of The Black Dossier... Got a little distracted by the awesomeness!
And I look forward to "The Cats of Ulthar" and "The Nameless City" quite a bit! You totally should do a Guided Tour of the Dream Quest stories.
(1) Xann, you've got some gems to look forward to in this first volume. Some tripe, as well, but not that much; most of the stories are okay at worst. I think my favorite of the ones you've yet to read might be ... nah, I'm not telling you. I'd rather see how you react to them all without any ideas in your mind!
(2) One of the problems you might theoretically have with "Herbert West" has to do with the way in which it was written/published. It was published in installments -- and may have been written that way (I can't remember and am too lazy to research the matter) -- and this resulted in Lovecraft writing artificial and increasingly complicated summaries at the beginning of each new installment. I seem to remember somebody speculating that he grew tired of this pretty quickly and eventually began just kind of fucking around with them. The end result is that the story -- which is less a story than a small collection of stories (or so it could be argued) -- seems to start and stop and then start again in two-steps-back manner. So the story as presented has too little momentum. I still kind of dig it, but it's not my favorite, and if it weren't for the movie I don't think anyone would ever talk about the story at all.
(3) Whereas in the case of "The Lurking Fear," if it weren't for the story nobody would ever talk about the movie.
(4) I think I'd probably have "The Rats in the Walls" near the top of my personal HPL faves list, if only for the degree to which it influenced Stephen King's "Jerusalem's Lot." HPL wins the head-to-head on that one, but I love "Jerusalem's Lot" and think of it fondly as my first Lovecraft(ian) story.
McMolo - I love From Beyond! Bryant and I did a Lovecraft film appreciation day with some friends and my folks, and it was a highlight to be sure. I honestly like it better than Re-Animator, which I know might sound like blasphemy to some; if so, this blasphemer will take his Barbara Crampton scenes and go.
I swear, anytime someone starts talking about cricket, it sounds like they're either having a stroke, or have been possessed by some cosmic horror. That being said, I hear Alastair Cook hit an unbeaten century.
Man, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is on an entirely different level; I’ve read half of Providence, and enjoyed it, but it’s nowhere near LXG. In a world with infinite time, an idea of mine has always been to read / watch every work referenced over the course of LXG and the succeeding Nemo volumes. I don’t know that I’d want to blog about it, but I would absolutely love to design and teach a high-level, two-semester English Lit course using those works as the syllabus.
Bryant – (1) I appreciate your restraint! It’s interesting, in a world where people actively give out / look for spoilers before a work comes out, to see how each of my friends handles the issue. There’s a joke in an early Big Bang Theory episode (I was young, and didn’t know better, I swear) where Sheldon gets annoyed at the comic book shop owner for telling him the newest issue of a series is “mind-blowing.” While I don’t quite approach that level, I am a firm opponent of spoilers in any capacity.
The argument could be made – and by not disclosing your favorite, I’d say you agree – that since I know your tastes and respect your opinion, knowing which story you like best would set an expectation. My buddy Adam’s favorite Lovecraft story is “The Whisperer in Darkness,” and he implored me to read it. I did, and greatly enjoyed it, but what if it had failed to “live up to the hype?” At the same time, I actively seek out your rankings of King’s works, and let your thoughts inform my decisions on what to purchase and read.
(2) I had either completely forgotten about the recaps at the beginning of each “Herbert West” section, or had intentionally blocked them out. Now that you bring them back up, that almost certainly plays a part in my less-than-glowing feelings about the story. You might remember that years ago I suggested a series to you called “Pendragon.” The series started out strong, but I eventually lost interest and never read the last two or three books.
A significant factor was that each book – all the way up to the tenth, I’m certain – included an increasingly lengthy synopsis of all the previous books. By “lengthy,” I mean tens of pages, all narrated by the main character, who became less sympathetic with each volume. On top of that, the recaps of the early books never changed much, so by book seven I had read the same summary of book one six times. The overall effect was to sour me greatly on any work that includes too much “last time on” summarizing, of which “Herbert West” is undeniably guilty.
(3) I had no idea there was a movie based on “The Lurking Fear!”
(4) I’ve never read “Jerusalem’s Lot” (or its big brother, which I know makes me a bad Tower fan) but it’s collected in that Del Rey Tales of the Cthulhu Mythos volume I have. I was wondering what traits made it Lovecraftian, and I guess now I know! Is that a spoiler, per the discussion above? Meh, for once I don’t know that I care.
(1) I kind of know where Sheldon is coming from on that. Only kind of ... but DEFINITELY kind of, you know?
(2) I liked that first Pendragon book. Weird that he included synopses that are that long. What would the point of that even be?
(3) There is, and it is ass.
(4) It's not a spoiler at all. You'd know what was up within a page or two, possibly even without having read "The Rats in the Walls."
Joshi didn't include them in his books, but there are at least two pieces of Lovecraft juvenilia that predate "The Beast in the Cave":
"The Little Glass Bottle" and "The Mystery of the Grave-Yard," both of which appear in the B&N complete edition. I wonder if Joshi felt they were simply TOO juvenile?
Post a Comment